Arnica 30 C wet Dose Page 2 of 1
Theoritical truths/facts and practical truths sometimes differ altogether.
It is very well known as well as established that research is never complete. The medicines which are prevalent in the market for scores of years are withdrawn from the market overnight based on the new findings contrary to the originals.
Homeopathy can not be construed as an exception that whatever is written in the text become the words of GOD.
If some person based on his experience over a long period of time has found out something new about the same old medicine the other practitioners should take it supportingly and do further reseach on that subject either independantly or toghether to find out the truth rather than snubbing the person with new ideas.
This way we can not only update our own knowledge but also give a modern outlook to homeopathy.
If Mr. Joe has been banned from expressing his views on this forum I , as a person feel it undemocratic and against the natural principles of justice. The moderator of this forum or whosoever may be the governingbody of this forum, should initiate immediate steps to reinstate Mr. Joe on this forum immediately.
Through this post let us invite the experiences of all those persons who have been taking ARNICA30c in wet dose over a long period of time. This may put the controversy arisen out of Mr. Joe's suggestion to rest once and for all.
I may make it very clear here that by this post I do not at all mean to be for or against anybody.Niether I wish to offence anybody. My only aim is to find out what is practically true.
Thanks and best regards to all the members of this forum and all others who are curious about the subject.
wonderman last decadeMy post dt 3Feb2008:
pls read 'offend' inlieu of 'offence' wherever appearing in para last but one of my above post.
wonderman last decadeNo. If they are true, they always work in tandem with eachother. You cannot have two truths which completely contradict eachother, as one must be incorrect. Such is the nature of truth, of which there is only one, the absolute.
This would be the case for allopathic medicines, not Homoeopathic, as by the very process of inclusion of such things into our materia medica, the effects of the substances are already known before this takes place. This is at least true for all our older remedies anyway, some 'modern Homoeopaths' of course foolishly add all manner of untested remedies to their materia medica. This is not though the case here. We also do not withdraw any of our remedies due to detrimental effects, as of course it is these 'detrimental' effects upon which we rely in the first place.
Oh, I see, well then we have different opinions on this, because to me truth comes only from experience and empiricial observation, either personally or on a widespread scale (which of course should be the case for deciding the truth of anything), and in this context Homoeopathic doctrine is the closest to absolute truth which exists in this area, and this is regardless of any deitical belief systems, which do not interest me. I have simply seen and experienced that contained within our doctrine to be truth, as have 200 years of other Homoeopaths, and we therefore know this is the case.
But Mr De Levira's approach is not anything new. Those professing to be Homoeopaths have been wrongly indulging in such practices, almost since our beginnings, and as stated, we have witnessed the outcome of these accordingly, and for the last 200 years. New Ideas should always be welcomed in science, but they must have some basis in reality to be included in this.
'Updating', and having a 'modern outlook' of Homoeopathy does not simply mean blindly including any new theory which comes along (which is unfortuantely the case today), especially when such theories are in complete opposition to our founding principles, which are tried, tested, and known to be true from experience, the only way to discover truth.
I cannot comment on this as I do not know the circumstances under which Mr De Levira was banned, maybe this was justified.
This has been tried before, elsewhere, and here too I believe...very few people come forward, and in fact when this was tried elsewhere, the majority of people came forward to say they were experiencing new symptoms.
Then we have the same aim, but discovering the truth comes by discernment, and scrutiny, it does not come from blind acceptance after reviewing only the most superficial aspects of a subject.
Mr Organon last decadeAs made clear in my post my intention has never been to offend anybody whomsoever but only to discover the truth from experience . This has also been admitted in your post by stating:
'and known to be true from experience, the only way to discover truth.'
I have nothing more to say.
With best of regards
wonderman last decade
To post a reply, you must first LOG ON or Register
Information given in this forum is given by way of exchange of views only, and those views are not necessarily those of ABC Homeopathy. It is not to be treated as a medical diagnosis or prescription, and should not be used as a substitute for a consultation with a qualified homeopath or physician. It is possible that advice given here may be dangerous, and you should make your own checks that it is safe. If symptoms persist, seek professional medical attention. Bear in mind that even minor symptoms can be a sign of a more serious underlying condition, and a timely diagnosis by your doctor could save your life.