|
|
Korsakov's = Hahneman's -dilutions ? corrispondence | From piergiorgio [Log on to view profile]  | on 2006-04-25 |
| 7 replies | 731 views |
hi,
Iwant to konw the equivalent dilution
Korsakov’s = hahnemann’s ?
XMK = CH ?
LMK = CH ?
CMK = CH ?
? = 200 CH
thanks for the help |
| |
| Re: Korsakov's = Hahneman's -dilutions ? corrispondence | From piergiorgio [Log on to view profile] | on 2006-04-26 |
nobody help me ?
please, I need the answer
Piergiorgio | | |
| Re: Korsakov's = Hahneman's -dilutions ? corrispondence | From PANKAJ VARMA [Log on to view profile] | on 2006-04-26 |
You seem to be talking in Russian language ! | | |
| Re: Korsakov's = Hahneman's -dilutions ? corrispondence | From kayhello [Log on to view profile] | on 2006-04-26 |
CH means centisemal in the way Hahnemann did it: 1:100 and with every potency NEW glass was used. CH is sam as C.
K: centisemal BUT in the way Korsakovv did it: 1:100 and with every new potency SAME glass was used.
Understand difference?
So: 200CH=200C=200K
Get it? | | |
| Re: Korsakov's = Hahneman's -dilutions ? corrispondence | From kayhello [Log on to view profile] | on 2006-04-26 |
Maybe this link is helpful... don't know how much you know about potenty preparations, have a look...
http://www.ritecare.com/homeopathic/guide_potency.asp | This thread continues beneath the following ad.
|
| |
| Re: Korsakov's = Hahneman's -dilutions ? corrispondence | From piergiorgio [Log on to view profile] | on 2006-04-26 |
I'm italian and i know that
my english are no good, sorry.
I want to know ( for exemple )
if i take a 200 K (korsakov)
is the same if I take a 200CH ? ( Hahnemann )
I don't think that
chemical correspondence is
200CH = 200K but
medical correnspondece
( effect ) is the same ? | | |
| Re: Korsakov's = Hahneman's -dilutions ? corrispondence | From kayhello [Log on to view profile] | on 2006-04-26 |
No need to apologize.
You've got it right when you say chemical correspondence is the same.
In my experience there is no difference in effect, but mind you i have not given the different potencies to lots and lots ok people.
This is my experience: i learned at school to use c potencies, but after a while found that k potencies were cheaper and so i tried them, my friend has used them on animals too and we found no difference in action with c potencies.
Maybe someone else will come along on the forum and share their experiences with us. I can just tell you what my experiences are.
I don't know the motivation of Korsakov on changing the preparation method of Hahnemann, i suggest you try to find that out. The key is probably in that. | | |
| Re: Korsakov's = Hahneman's -dilutions ? corrispondence | From PANKAJ VARMA [Log on to view profile] | on 2006-04-27 |
Dear Kayhello,
Thankyou for your inputs.
Pankaj Varma |
|
|
Important
Information given in this forum is given by way of exchange of views only, and those views are not necessarily those of ABC Homeopathy. It is not to be treated as a medical diagnosis or prescription, and should not be used as a substitute for a consultation with a qualified homeopath or physician. It is possible that advice given here may be dangerous, and you should make your own checks that it is safe. For example, taking mother tinctures can lead to serious side effects, and stopping prescribed medication without first consulting a physician can also endanger your health. If symptoms persist, seek professional medical attention. Bear in mind that even minor symptoms can be a sign of a more serious underlying condition, and a timely diagnosis by your doctor could save your life.